Sort the Social wire more deliberately
Open Advanced / Investigate → Social. Reporting first uses source-worded reporting style, original publication recency and link presence while spreading repeated publisher families and links. Source-perspective mix rotates through the organizational viewpoint groups actually available in your selection. Latest, global/publisher balance and severity ordering remain available.
Source political labels and reader identity do not affect the base reporting score. The perspective mix is a varied reading queue, not a political survey or a guarantee that every view is equally evidenced.
Source context and post wording are separate
Source badges now make their organizational scope explicit. Filter cited descriptions separately from older catalogue groupings and inspect their original references and review dates. The existing reviewed source catalogue and classifications are retained.
Post details separately describe reporting style and narrow English policy/evaluative-language cues, with matching excerpts and explanations. Quoted, attributed, negated, question, hypothetical and detected satire/fact-check wording is withheld from endorsement cues. Unknown is not treated as centrist, and no individual political profile is inferred.
Transparent limits and consistent pages
The post-framing rules are deliberately limited and are not a calibrated semantic-bias model. No post in the initial seven-day qualification selection met the narrow framing rules; the existing source labels still support perspective sorting. The main improvements are the source-perspective queue, reporting-style inspection and visibility into the evidence and gaps.
Comparison, reading-list saves and exports retain assessment metadata. Snapshot-aware paging restarts when the source selection or ranking minute changes. Original dates, provider access limits and account/replay controls remain in place.